September 16,
2005
Contact: Jeff Kuyper, Los Padres ForestWatch,
805-252-4277
Kim Delfino, Defenders of
Wildlife, 916-201-8277
John Buse, Center for
Biological Diversity, 312-237-1443
Conservation Groups File Appeal to Halt
MORE Oil Drilling
in Los Padres
California Attorney General Also
Files
an Appeal to Protect the Forest
SANTA BARBARA, CA - Three conservation groups today filed an
administrative appeal challenging a recent decision by the
U.S. Forest Service to expand oil drilling in California's
Los Padres National Forest. The state Attorney General's
Office also filed a separate appeal of the decision on
Tuesday.
In late July, the Forest Service
approved a plan to allow oil drilling on an additional
52,075 acres of land in the Los Padres National Forest. The
decision threatens popular recreation areas, wild lands,
clean air and water, and habitat for several endangered
species, including the California condor.
The agency's plan would allow
slant drilling at this site near the Dick Smith Wilderness,
and would encourage surface drilling at a nearby private
inholding. Photo © LPFW, Inc.
"The Los Padres is already contributing
its fair share of oil development to the nation. We should
not have to sacrifice even more of our clean water, scenic
vistas, and recreation for less than a day's supply of oil,"
said Jeff Kuyper, executive director of Los Padres
ForestWatch.
According to the agency's own
estimates, new oil drilling in the Los Padres would yield
only 17 million barrels of oil. This is less than a day's
supply of oil at our nation's current consumption rate.
"The agency's plan requires a vast
network of roads, pipelines, and transmission wires that
will cut through the heart of some of the most sensitive
areas of the forest, including key habitat for the
critically endangered California condor," said Kim Delfino,
California Program Director for Defenders of Wildlife. "The
Forest Service's analysis fails to acknowledge the
widespread impacts of drilling to sensitive wildlife species
and the land and waterways they need to survive."
Oil operations on private land in
the Cuyama Valley near the forest boundary. © LPFW, Inc.
The decision allows surface drilling
along the boundaries of three Congressionally-designated
wilderness areas, the Sespe Condor Sanctuary, and the Hopper
Mountain National Wildlife Refuge.
Slant drilling is allowed beneath
portions of Sespe Creek and Piru Creek that are eligible for
Wild & Scenic River designation.
During the public comment period for
the plan, the Forest Service received 7,800 comments from
the public. A vast majority of these comments - 99% -
opposed new oil drilling in the Los Padres. Several local,
state, and national legislators have joined in this
opposition, including Congresswoman Lois Capps, Senators
Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, Assemblymember Pedro
Nava, Santa Barbara County Supervisors Susan Rose and Salud
Carbajal, and Ventura County Supervisor Steve Bennett.
A proposed drilling site along the
Cuyama River in Santa Barbara County.
©
LPFW, Inc.
In analyzing the environmental impacts
of the drilling plan, the Forest Service primarily relied on
a 13-year-old report to conclude that new drilling would
only impact 20 acres of the national forest. The report -
dubbed the Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario -
was written in 1993 and was never updated. In their
appeal, the groups argue that this report is outdated and
relies on inaccurate projections, severely underestimating
today's price of oil and understating the extent and
probable environmental impacts of future oil drilling on Los
Padres.
"The agency has relied on outdated data
and unsubstantiated opinions to conclude that new oil
drilling will not have any significant impacts," said John
Buse, staff attorney with the Center for Biological
Diversity. "In doing so, the Forest Service has failed to
uphold the high level of scientific integrity called for by
our nation's longstanding environmental laws, and has acted
recklessly toward condors, other endangered species, and the
public's right to recreate on public lands."
A
proposed drilling area in Quatal Canyon in the Upper Cuyama
Valley.
The plan allows both surface and slant drilling in this
area. Photo
©
LPFW, Inc.
The appeal also argues that the Forest
Service failed to adequately analyze the environmental
impacts of the drilling plan. The agency postponed much of
this analysis until an unspecified later date.
The groups filing the appeal are Los
Padres ForestWatch, based in Santa Barbara, California;
Defenders of Wildlife, based in Washington, D.C.; and the
Center for Biological Diversity, based in Tucson, Arizona.
The U.S. Forest Service has up to 160 days to
formally respond to the appeal. An appeal is the last step
before a lawsuit can be filed to compel the agency to follow
the law.