SMITH'S BLUE
BUTTERFLY
Euphilotes
enoptes smithi
Photo by Don Roberson
In 1948, while exploring the
Big Sur coast, two university students discovered a previously
unknown small blue butterfly. When one of the students, Claude
Smith, died a few years later, his friend named the butterfly
after him, and it’s still officially known today as Smith’s blue
butterfly.
This tiny little butterfly, with a wing diameter of only one
inch, thrives only on specific coastal dune, prairie and scrub
habitat along an 80-mile stretch of coast in Central California.
More
than half of the butterfly's range is within the Los Padres
National Forest. With the loss of 50% of its habitat, Smith’s blue butterfly
became one of the first insects to be recognized as an
endangered species, in 1976.
Smith’s blue butterfly
depends entirely on two species of buckwheat as host
plants during all stages of the butterfly's life: coast
buckwheat and seacliff buckwheat. The
butterfly’s emergence is timed with the blooming of the
buckwheat flower, starting in June. During its short, one-week
lifespan, the butterfly feeds, mates, and lays eggs only on the
flowers of these buckwheats. In exchange, the buckwheat flowers
are pollinated by the adult butterflies.
Seacliff buckwheat, the host
plant of Smith's blue butterfly.
Corresponding with the
flowering of the buckwheat, the entire adult population of
Smith’s blue butterfly is active only from June to September,
during which time the butterflies fly around frantically looking
for food and mates. When they find each other, males and females
will engage in a brief courtship in which they flutter their
wings on top of the buckwheat flowers. After mating, the female
butterfly lays a single egg in the flower head of the buckwheat.
After hatching, the caterpillar feeds on the buckwheat
flowerheads for several weeks, during which time it is tended by
native ants. The ants protect the caterpillars from predators
and parasites like wasps and spiders, and receive a sugary
liquid in return. After several weeks of feeding, the
caterpillar then spends the next 47 weeks in the chrysalis form,
attached to the buckwheat plant or protected in the leaf litter.
They remain dormant for the winter, awaiting next spring's bloom
of the buckwheat, when the process begins all over
again.
Threats
Most experts agree that the
number one threat to Smith’s blue butterfly is the disappearance
of its coastal habitat, 50% of which has been lost to
development, roads, invasive species, and other threats. Its
dependence on seacliff and coast buckwheat makes the butterfly
especially sensitive to invasive plants like iceplant, European
beach grass, and yellow-star thistle which outcompete and
smother native buckwheat plants. Other threats to Smith’s blue
butterfly include off-road vehicle use, road building, sand
mining, road and trail maintenance, and wildfire suppression.
On the Los Padres National
Forest, commercial livestock grazing is of particular concern,
as cattle can trample native seacliff buckwheat, crush butterfly
chrysalises buried in the leaf litter, and spread weed
infestations. In 2005, the Forest Service authorized livestock
grazing on several allotments along the Big Sur coast. Federal
biologists estimate that 20% of the seacliff buckwheat in these
allotments are in areas "likely to be affected" by livestock
grazing. The biologists ordered the Forest Service to carefully
monitor the impacts of grazing.
|
|
Seacliff buckwheat not affected by livestock grazing
(left). Seacliff buckwheat on the Gorda grazing
allotment on the Los Padres National Forest (right), its
growth stunted by cattle browsing and trampling, can
barely be distinguished from the 2" tall grass
surrounding it. |
Conservation
Smith's blue butterfly was
placed on the endangered species list in 1976, and federal
biologists proposed to protect the butterfly's critical habitat
in 1977. However, this critical habitat was never officially
designated. The US Fish and Wildlife Service, moreover, has no
definitive knowledge on population size or trend for the
species. The US Fish and Wildlife Service did issue a Recovery
Plan for the Smith’s blue butterfly in 1984, but that plan has
not been updated since then and federal biologists now consider
it to be “obsolete.”
The Los Padres National Forest
has not undertaken any comprehensive surveys of Smith's blue
butterfly on the Monterey Ranger District. Despite these lack of
surveys, the Forest Service continues to approve activities like
commercial livestock grazing that could adversely affect the
butterfly.
All
hope is not lost for the butterfly, however, as there have been
a number of efforts in recent years to alleviate the threat of
invasive species along coastal bluffs and dunes, restore native
habitat, and protect butterfly habitat from additional impacts.
The California Park Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, and a
host of non-profit organizations are working to remove
non-native plant species, replace them with local natives, and
create corridors of buckwheat so that the butterflies can
disperse up and down the coast, restoring their former range.
Restoration efforts include the designation of the first
insect-based preserve in the US, at the site of the former Fort
Ord in Monterey County. On national forest lands, ForestWatch is
working to ensure that the Forest Service fulfills its
obligations to monitor and report the effects of livestock
grazing in Smith's blue butterfly habitat, and to protect the
butterfly from harm.
|