LOS  PADRES  FORESTWATCH

PROTECTING OUR PUBLIC LANDSALONG CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST

home about us

our region

current projects join or donate take action!  

FORESTWATCH IN THE NEWS


Click a headline to automatically scroll down to a specific article.
 

Sale of oil and gas lease blocked, Santa Barbara News-Press, Sep 7, 2006

BLM voids lease sale of energy rights, Bakersfield Californian, Sep 7, 2006

Wilderness plots won't be sold for oil exploration, San Luis Obispo Tribune, Sep 9, 2006

BLM withdraws oil leases from Los Padres land, Ojai Valley News, Sep 13, 2006

 


SANTA BARBARA NEWS-PRESS
September 7, 2006

Sale of oil and gas leases blocked

Federal officials respond to complaints by a nonprofit group and landowners

by Anna Davison, News-Press Staff Writer

The sale of 10,000 acres of oil and gas leases near Los Padres National Forest has been canceled in response to objections from a nonprofit group and some landowners.

Los Padres ForestWatch had been trying to stop the sale, which included land in the Cuyama Valley, for some time, and eight landowners later joined the group in protesting the sales.

ForestWatch's appeal blocked the planned lease auctions in November 2005, but the sales went ahead in June.  However, now federal officials have announced that 11 leases are being revoked in response to the complaints.

"We took a look at those and said, 'Yeah, they might have a point here,'" said John Dearing, spokesman for the Bureau of Land Management, which conducted the sale.

"They are no longer up for lease at this time," he said, although "they may be offered at a future time."

Jeff Kuyper, executive director of ForestWatch, said "we were primarily concerned that the oil drilling would cause significant impacts to wildlife, forest recreation and clean water supplies, and all of these oil leases were located right along the boundaries of some of our national treasures."

The leases are rimmed by Los Padres National Forest, the Carrizo Plain National Monument and the Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge -- established to protect habitat of endangered California condors.

Both ForestWatch and landowners had also protested the Bureau of Land Management's notification of the lease sales.

The areas in question are what's called "split estate lands." The surface land is privately owned, but the federal government owns the minerals under the surface. The Bureau of Land Management is required to conduct competitive lease sales for those rights.

Leaseholders have the right of access to the leases, but they need to get other permits to be able to drill, either for exploration or production. Conditions are often put on permits in order to protect plants, animals and the environment.


THE BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN
September 7, 2006

BLM voids lease sale of energy rights

The Bureau of Land Management has retroactively withdrawn some 10,000 acres from an oil and gas lease sale that took place in June.

The agency's Aug. 31 decision voided the sale of energy rights under 11 parcels in or near Kern County.

Environmentalists see this as a victory, but the agency plans to redraft environmental documents and hold another auction, said Ron Huntsinger, who manages the BLM field office in Bakersfield.

Huntsinger doesn't know when that auction might take place, but the agency will likely wait until it has enough properties in that general area to warrant a sale, he said.

BLM's environmental documents "need more than just a little brush up," said Jeff Kuyper, executive director of Los Padres ForestWatch, one of the groups that protested the sale.

These lands are all home to sensitive species and aren't appropriate for energy exploration, he said.

Huntsinger disagreed. "That's a bunch of bunk, frankly," he said. "The areas we're leasing are areas we've used for energy development for quite some time."

In addition to Los Padres ForestWatch and the Center for Biological Diversity, eight property owners protested the sale.

Among the companies that purchased the contested rights is West Coast Land Service of Bakersfield.


SAN LUIS OBISPO TRIBUNE
September 9, 2006

Wilderness plots won't be sold for oil exploration

Bureau of Land Management will delay sale after activists objected

by Stephen Curran

Months after an environmental coalition challenged its plan to auction ecologically sensitive land for possible oil exploration, the federal Bureau of Land Management announced it will suspend the sale of 10,000 acres that include some of San Luis Obispo County's most remote areas.

The decision — the second time in less than a year the agency has withdrawn the deal — revokes the June 16 sale of 11 parcels near the Carrizo Plain National Monument, Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge in Kern County, and Los Padres National Forest.

Activists from Los Padres ForestWatch and the Center for Biological Diversity had challenged the sale, saying the BLM did not adequately study the effects of oil drilling on sensitive wildlife in the region. The auction, they said, would have been the first step to allowing oil development on the land.

Withdrawing the land delays any possible sale until that more thorough analysis is completed. More than 20,000 acres in San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Kern, Ventura and Kings counties were eligible for the auction.

"It's a victory," said John Buse, an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity. "... For now, I think it means that we're not going to see oil development on those sites without some further work by the BLM."

John Dearing, a Sacramento-based spokesman for the BLM, did not return calls for comment Friday afternoon. In December, he told The Tribune that the agency was in the midst of a draft management plan, which is less thorough than a full environmental impact statement.

That management plan, said ForestWatch executive director Jeff Kuyper, came after the BLM aborted an auction initially scheduled for December after his group complained the agency failed to properly notify the public. A second auction was scheduled for June.

The BLM's history, he added, does not bode well for future attempts to sell the land.

"The BLM had tried twice to make these lands available for oil drilling, and they've failed twice," Kuyper said. "It's definitely going to be an uphill battle for them if they do try to open up these lands for oil drilling. We're going to be watching them every step of the way."

Four of the revoked parcels covering more than 1,800 acres lie along the boundary to Carrizo Plain National Monument, most of which is located in the southeastern corner of San Luis Obispo County. Environmentalists say the monument contains one of the highest concentrations of endangered plants and animals in the state.

 


OJAI VALLEY NEWS
September 13, 2006

BLM withdraws oil leases from Los Padres land

Landowners credit ForestWatch for removal of more than half of acreage

by Nao Braverman

Environmentalists and rural landowners celebrated a hard-earned victory last week.

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management withdrew 10,088 acres of land from a recent oil lease sale.

"Our region's national forests, monuments, and wildlife refuges are now safe from development," said Jeff Kuyper, executive director of Los Padres ForestWatch, a nonprofit environmental organization that works to protect public lands from damage caused by oil development.

In June the Bureau auctioned 19,870 acres near the border of Los Padres National Forest, Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge, and Carrizo Plain National Monument including pacels in Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties.

With the purchase of a lease, an oil company has the right to set up oil wells, drill and install pipelines on a parcel even if there is a surface landowner, said John Dearing, public affairs representative for the Bureau of Land Management.

Before the sale, Los Padres ForestWatch collaborated with eight landowners in the area to file a formal complaint asking the bureau to withdraw about half of the properties up for lease.

Charles Fox owns a plot of land in the foothills above Cuyama. He bought the land so that he could savor the undeveloped wilderness of his surroundings and enjoy a peaceful retirement, tucked away from the rest of civilization.

So several months ago, when he heard that the mineral rights to his parcel might be leased to an oil company, he was in a state of shock.

The thought of oil rigs, and pipelines tearing up the landscape surrounding his home was enough to make him consider moving away.

"The government never attempted to contact me when my land went up for lease," he said. "If it weren't for ForestWatch, I wouldn't have known about it."

Though the bureau was required to inform all of the surface landowners whose mineral rights were being auctioned, there was only a bulletin posted on the bureau's field office and one on the web site. None of the approximately 48 surface landowners were contacted personally.

If they had known about it, the landowners would have been able to buy back the mineral rights from the government or to bid on them during the auction. However, none were personally informed by the bureau, said Kuyper.

Eight landowners joined ForestWatch, made phone calls to the bureau's officials and signed a formal complaint asking them to remove the 10,088 acres from the sale because the property owners had not properly been informed.

The formal complaint also included concerns about the environmental damage to land which comes dangerously close to a natural wildlife refuge and is near the home of various endangered species.

The Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge has been set aside as habitat for the endangered California condor since 1985, and Carrizo Plain National Monument contains one of the highest concentrations of endangered plants and animals in California, according to Kuyper's research.

"Every piece of land they were proposing to lease has an endangered species on it," he said, "including the California condor, San Joaquin kit fox as well as a number of rare plant species."

Initially the bureau did not respond. The auction took place in June, all 19,870 acres included. Some land was auctioned off for a price as low as $2 per acre.

Then last week, after reviewing the protest, the bureau decided to remove all challenged properties from the sale, and revoke all the leases. Eleven of the parcels for sale were revoked. Of those parcels, 2,160 acres returned were along the boundary of the Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge and more than 1,800 were along the boundary of the Carrizo Plain National Monument.

This was the second time that the bureau canceled the lease sale of subsurface rights to these properties. A lease sale including the same parcels was first canceled in November of 2005 because th eagency did not properly notify the public and failed to prepare a proper environmental assessment.

Fox is pleased with the bureau's decision but doesn't believe the battle is over.

"It's happened once before, though I never knew about it. And I don't doubt that it will raise its ugly head again," he said.

For now, ForestWatch staff are happy to see their protest was adhered to.

"We're very pleased with their decision to protect national treasures," said Kuyper.

  


All material copyright © 2004-2009 Los Padres ForestWatch, Inc.